tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-717875266905215662.post7154318317900244420..comments2016-06-22T17:21:30.235-07:00Comments on The Cinema of Estrangement: The Hour of the WolfAl Millerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03251435271776441569noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-717875266905215662.post-45026791975002387482011-01-24T09:19:06.913-08:002011-01-24T09:19:06.913-08:00Obviously, this movie contains extremely explicit ...Obviously, this movie contains extremely explicit sexual undertones, and I agree that the child can symbolize his homosexual past. I think that the nature in which he kills the child and the fact that entire scene is silent is an artful description of the fact that Johan wants to silence such feelings to the rest of the world. The fact that the child bites him shows that he is indeed still pained by such feelings and the struggle actually represents a mental struggle he is experiences. Also, I think there is heavy symbolism in the fact that the shot of the dead child in the water is shown several times. I believe it heavily emphasizes the fact that he considers such feelings to be resolved, but in reality, they are floating right near the surface ready to bubble up again.Emmit Kellarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12474028983977157437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-717875266905215662.post-77601625958625234502011-01-23T20:43:55.521-08:002011-01-23T20:43:55.521-08:00I believe the reason the boy is used as the demon ...I believe the reason the boy is used as the demon for Johan’s homosexual urges because his experimentation took place during his youth. In this sense, by killing the boy Johan is actually killing part of his past. Along with his past Johan seems to struggle with his masculinity. In the film one of the wealthy eccentrics dresses him up in basically drag. He is then sent to have sex with his love from the past only to be laughed at. Both of these are a slap in the face to manhood. He isn’t seen as a man in wolf’s clothes and by laughing at him during before sex his sexual prowess is put into question and/or he could be impotent at his age.George Schlosserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16906664763607931777noreply@blogger.com